AI Search Visibility Platform

See how AI answers describe your brand.

Track when ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Grok mention your brand, cite your sources, recommend competitors, or leave you out entirely, then turn those gaps into prompt briefs and CLI-driven implementation work.

Monitoring-only tools show the score. Prompts-GPT is built for the next job: explain the evidence, decide the fix, and ship the change from the same workflow.

Free instant check — no signup or credit card required.

12 engines monitored23 visibility metrics
ChatGPTGoogle AIGoogle AI ModePerplexityGoogle GeminiAnthropic Claude

Evidence before score

Many tools show an aggregate score first. Prompts-GPT.com keeps answer excerpts, citations, confidence, and source context visible before asking for a decision.

Prompt-to-monitor handoff

Prompt discovery, Prompt Studio, public checker, and saved monitors share the same buyer-question workflow so a useful prompt does not die as a one-off run.

Agent orchestration for execution

The CLI turns evidence into local agent runs, parallel reviews, pipelines, evals, and worktree diffs.

12

Configured engines

5

Core report surfaces

6

Free tools

23

Visibility metrics

Product proof

Teams need evidence they can explain fast.

The strongest product pattern is consistency: one place to see the answer, the cited sources, the competitor pressure, and the next action without opening five tools.

12

Configured engines

Product proof comes from current product configuration, saved answer evidence, and documented report surfaces rather than testimonials or unsupported review ratings.

5

Core report surfaces

Product proof comes from current product configuration, saved answer evidence, and documented report surfaces rather than testimonials or unsupported review ratings.

6

Free tools

Product proof comes from current product configuration, saved answer evidence, and documented report surfaces rather than testimonials or unsupported review ratings.

Why teams switch

Most AI visibility tools stop at the dashboard.

Public category reviews and product docs keep showing the same pattern: monitoring is table stakes, but teams still need clearer next actions after the dashboard. The product pairs monitoring with action workflows, prompt briefs, and local agent handoff instead of stopping at a dashboard snapshot.

Tier 1: Monitoring-only ($29–$189/mo)

Fast visibility snapshots and prompt tracking. Otterly and similar tools start here with 15–100 prompts, but leave teams asking what to fix next.

Tier 2: Optimization platforms ($95–$579/mo)

Add citation analytics, content audits, and recommendations. Peec, Promptwatch, and Scrunch operate here, but still stop before local implementation ownership.

Tier 3: Enterprise suites ($399–$699+/mo)

Broad reporting, large prompt databases, and deep analytics. Profound, Ahrefs, and Semrush suites fit here, but procurement friction and pricing lock out most teams.

Monitor

Monitor with evidence

Track 23 metrics across 12 configured engines with prompt-level answer evidence, citations, and competitor context.

Optimize

Optimize with evidence

Turn misses into source fixes, FAQ updates, comparison pages, schema improvements, and prompt-gap prioritization.

Implement

Implement with evidence

Use content briefs, project workflows, free tools, and agent workflows to move from findings into shipped changes.

Orchestrate

Orchestrate with evidence

Run parallel agents, chain pipelines, and evaluate results via CLI so AI visibility gaps can become local implementation work.

Crawler proof is still thin

Competitive pages increasingly mention sources and citations, but the strongest buyer need is still a provable path from crawler reads to answer evidence and page fixes.

Prompt intelligence is fragmented

Otterly, Peec, Semrush, Ahrefs, and Profound all emphasize prompt or question tracking. The gap is turning discovery prompts into saved monitors, briefs, and implementation queues.

Traffic attribution is inconsistent

AI referral conversion research is directionally strong but varies by study and industry. Product copy should show attribution as a workflow, not a guaranteed lift.

Implementation is the missing layer

Most platforms can identify misses and recommendations. Buyers still need a workflow that creates briefs, schema tasks, comparison pages, source outreach, and validation runs.

No agent orchestration for visibility

Multi-agent coding tools are growing quickly, and AI visibility platforms are adding recommendations. Public competitor materials do not show a visibility-focused CLI with parallel, pipeline, and eval modes.

MCP is becoming table stakes

Peec AI now documents native MCP integration and prompt workflows, and other vendors are broadening API access. Dashboards alone are no longer enough — SDK and MCP-style access make visibility evidence usable inside content, engineering, and reporting workflows.

Brand monitoring tools are converging on AI

Yext Scout, BrandBeacon, Trackerly, and ClayHog now offer AI-specific brand monitoring alongside traditional brand tracking. The category boundary between brand monitoring and AI visibility is dissolving.

Keyword-to-prompt expansion eliminates setup friction

SEOmonitor generates 50K+ prompt variations per keyword automatically. This eliminates the manual prompt setup barrier that slows adoption on prompt-based platforms.

Citation absorption matters more than raw citation counts

2026 GEO research separates source selection from answer absorption: pages can be cited without shaping the final answer. Product surfaces should expose evidence quality, answer excerpts, and source influence rather than counting URLs only.

Repeated evidence beats one-off score precision

Recent AI Overview and GEO studies show wide variance by query form, engine, and source behavior. Free checks should be useful, but paid value must come from repeated monitors, confidence labels, and trend comparison.

AboutWhat is Prompts-GPT.com?

Prompts-GPT.com is an AI search visibility platform that monitors how brands appear in AI-generated answers across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Grok. It tracks 23 visibility metrics including brand mention rate, citation share, competitor displacement, sentiment analysis, citation velocity, and prompt-space occupancy. The platform combines monitoring, optimization, implementation, and local agent orchestration so missed mentions can become content briefs, schema fixes, outreach targets, and verified implementation runs.

Category: AI Search visibility platform — monitoring + optimization + implementation

Engines: ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok + 7 more configured surfaces (12 total)

Free tools: 6 tools, no signup required

Pricing: Free tier plus Prompt Studio $19/mo, Starter $99/mo, Pro $249/mo, Agency $579/mo.

Market context: AI visibility tooling is an emerging category with fast-changing public research, so the product emphasizes prompt-level evidence instead of unsourced guarantees.

Workflow: The product pairs monitoring with action workflows, prompt briefs, and local agent handoff instead of stopping at a dashboard snapshot.