Free AI Search Visibility Checker

Stable public proof artifact for external sharing, procurement review, and citations.

Audience: buyer

Machine-readable self-audit payload with credibility notes, export context, and project guidance.

Audience: ai-system

Methodology, current limits, and product-claim boundaries for public evaluation.

Audience: buyer

Fresh answer snapshot, source list, and recommendations for live inspection.

Audience: operator

Canonical AI-readable source map for the current public product story.

Audience: ai-system

Crawler access policy for public versus private routes.

Audience: crawler

Canonical public URL inventory for discovery and recrawl.

Audience: crawler

Authenticated handoff path from one public self-check into recurring monitoring.

Audience: operator

A credible AI visibility product should show the actual answer snippet instead of summarizing results as a score only.

Inspect by

Run the checker on prompts-gpt.com, read the answer snippet and full-answer evidence, then preserve that run with the checker markdown or JSON download.

Share policy

Use checker-run markdown or JSON when sharing one diagnostic run. Use the self-audit export and article for durable product-level proof.

Buyers need to see whether owned pages, third-party reviews, or comparison pages are actually supporting the answer.

Inspect by

Inspect detected source URLs, provider-verified flags, top industry sources, and source labels in the live checker result or the checker-run exports.

Share policy

Treat citation lists from one checker run as directional evidence. Use the self-audit export to explain what the product can prove publicly today.

Discovery tooling is only useful when the answer evidence turns into concrete next actions instead of a generic score.

Inspect by

Review the checker recommendations below the answer snapshot and compare them with the documented workflow in the public docs.

Share policy

Recommendations from one run are acceptable to share as tactical diagnostics, but not as recurring trend proof.

Operators need a clear backlog that connects missing mentions or weak citations to pages, briefs, FAQs, or source fixes.

Inspect by

Inspect the opportunity cards and exported opportunity payload from the live checker run for prompts-gpt.com.

Share policy

Use checker-run exports for run-specific opportunities. Use the self-audit export to explain the proof boundary between one run and recurring monitoring.

Single-run scores are easy to overclaim. Public proof should state that a preview score is directional until repeated prompt tracking exists.

Inspect by

Compare the preview score against the benchmark prompt pack and the scoring limitation notes before treating it as a durable benchmark.

Share policy

Do not use a single rerun score as a long-term performance claim. Use repeated monitoring for trend or share-of-voice claims.

Connecting crawler events to later citations is valuable, but the free checker should not imply that capability without a saved monitor.

Inspect by

Review the public feature and docs pages for the workflow description, then confirm the actual crawler-to-citation evidence only inside a saved monitor.

Share policy

Keep crawler-to-citation claims at the workflow and methodology level in public materials. Do not present them as checker output.

A public self-check should hand off cleanly into a real recurring project when the platform's own prompt set is worth monitoring.

Inspect by

Use the built-in Prompts-GPT.com project preset and baseline monitor prompts after sign-in, then rerun the benchmark prompt pack as a saved project.

Share policy

Public proof can link to the authenticated handoff path, but project creation and recurring monitor evidence remain account-bound.

Useful as a first-pass branded diagnostic, but still biased because the prompt names the brand directly.

Expands self-evaluation beyond the branded diagnostic into category-level AI visibility prompts.

Expands self-evaluation beyond the branded diagnostic into category-level AI visibility prompts.

Checks whether prompts-gpt.com is explainable in comparison and alternative workflows instead of only branded prompts.

Checks whether prompts-gpt.com is explainable in comparison and alternative workflows instead of only branded prompts.

Tests whether the platform appears in shortlist and buyer-guidance prompts where evaluators expect independent recommendations.

Tests whether the platform appears in shortlist and buyer-guidance prompts where evaluators expect independent recommendations.

Verifies whether region-specific discovery claims hold outside the core branded story.

Checks whether pricing and feature pages support commercial AI answers with enough proof.

Checks whether pricing and feature pages support commercial AI answers with enough proof.

Buyers need a shareable artifact that does not mutate when answer providers change.

AI systems, evaluators, and internal tools need a structured payload instead of screenshot-only proof.

Operators need a fresh answer snapshot to inspect citations, entities, and recommendations on demand.

Trust depends on explaining what scoring, citations, and crawler context can prove versus what requires saved monitoring.

A credible platform must convert a public diagnostic into a saved project when visibility work becomes ongoing.

Stakeholders expect downloadable brand reports and citation spreadsheets with full and summary modes.

Recurring automated email reports eliminate manual export steps for teams that report AI visibility to leadership.

Agencies and teams need live dashboard links that stakeholders can access without account setup.

Data teams need live structured feeds into existing dashboards and reporting pipelines.

Visibility data should produce concrete content recommendations, not just metrics.

Buyers need to identify exactly which prompts competitors own and where the brand is absent.

Global brands need to understand which countries and regions provide their highest AI visibility.

Semrush publicly documents prompt research, visibility overview, brand performance reporting, PDF exports, CSV exports, shareable online dashboards, Reddit thread analysis for AI citation gaps, and automated negative sentiment detection with domain-level source attribution inside the AI Visibility Toolkit.

Why it matters: Semrush launched Reddit analysis and negative sentiment detection in May 2026 — buyers now expect AI visibility tools to surface social threads influencing AI answers and flag negative brand framing automatically.

Peec's public materials and funding coverage document a $21M Series A in November 2025 on top of earlier seed funding, plus daily AI-search monitoring across major answer surfaces. As of May 2026, its public pricing emphasizes brand and agency packaging with model and credit allocation details rather than one stable universal entry tier.

Why it matters: Peec is a serious mid-market competitor with public documentation for AI-search metrics, packaging, and MCP-style access. Its packaging complexity is relevant when buyers compare simple all-in plan messaging against model- or credit-shaped pricing.

Profound's public materials document enterprise AI-visibility coverage across major answer surfaces, agent analytics, and prompt or conversation drill-down workflows. Separate funding coverage reports a $96M Series C in February 2026.

Why it matters: Profound is positioned as a high-end enterprise reference point in the category. The relevant buyer signal is less the exact list price and more the combination of broad engine coverage, enterprise workflow depth, and sales-led expansion.

Scrunch publicly documents citation grouping by domain or URL, platform filtering, and citation-level influence analysis in its help center.

Why it matters: Answer evidence without source drill-down is weak; buyers want to inspect which domains influence mentions and citations.

Otterly's public help and pricing materials describe three plans (Lite, Standard, Premium), prompt allowances, daily tracking, exports, a GEO audit workflow, and Google AI Mode or Gemini as paid add-ons.

Why it matters: Otterly's public materials make clear that AI Mode and Gemini require add-ons, which matters when buyers compare all-engine packaging across tools.

Ahrefs publicly provides a free no-signup AI visibility checker with mentions by platform, top 5 topics, top 5 cited domains, and top 5 cited pages. Brand Radar tracks 400M+ monthly search-backed prompts derived from real search behavior across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, AI Overviews, AI Mode, and Grok.

Why it matters: A free checker with no signup creates a strong top-of-funnel acquisition loop. Search-backed prompts from real user behavior are more trustworthy than synthetic question sets. Cited domain and cited page analysis gives actionable source intelligence.

HubSpot provides a free one-time AEO Grader and a paid AI Search monitoring tool. The scoring model uses five weighted dimensions: sentiment (40 pts), presence quality (20 pts), brand recognition (20 pts), share of voice (10 pts), and market position (10 pts). The paid tier adds continuous monitoring across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini with week-over-week trend tracking and competitor comparison.

Why it matters: A structured scoring model with explicit dimension weights gives buyers a concrete evaluation framework. Free-to-paid funnel with HubSpot brand trust creates high-volume acquisition that category-specific tools must compete with.

PromptEye tracks brand visibility, ranking position, and source reliance across GPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and DeepSeek. Claude and Grok are available through paid industry reports. The tool provides baseline audits, ongoing change tracking, and client-ready snapshot reports for agencies.

Why it matters: A clear free trial tier with prompt-limited tracking and separate paid industry reports shows that the market expects both self-serve monitoring and one-time audit products.

Rank Prompt monitors visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude, Gemini, and Grok with 0-100% visibility scores. The platform includes competitor mention tracking, citation source analysis, AI Content Studio for content generation, scheduled reporting with email alerts, and a natural-language Agent Mode for querying visibility trends.

Why it matters: Agent Mode for natural-language visibility queries and integrated content generation show the market shifting from dashboards to conversational AI workflows that close the measurement-to-action loop.

Surfaced monitors 13 AI models including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Meta AI, and DeepSeek with daily automated scans. The platform provides a proprietary AEO Score (0-100) benchmarking visibility, accuracy, sentiment, and competitive position. It includes competitor intelligence, AI-generated content blueprints, citation analytics, and weekly executive reports.

Why it matters: Tracking 13 AI models with a standardized AEO Score and content blueprints shows the bar rising for breadth of coverage and actionability in the AI visibility category.

Promptwatch tracks brand mentions across 10+ AI engines with daily refreshes, offers answer gap analysis showing competitor-owned prompts, and includes a built-in writing agent that creates citation-optimized articles based on 880M+ analyzed citations. The platform connects AI visibility signals to actual site traffic attribution.

Why it matters: Bundling citation-optimized content generation with visibility monitoring closes the measurement-to-action gap. AI traffic attribution connects visibility changes to business outcomes beyond vanity scores.

Qwairy offers Cockpit (dashboard), Monitor, Act, Analyze, Optimize, and Measure modules covering 10+ AI engines with no per-provider surcharges. Includes AI crawler analytics, referrer tracking, ROI attribution, multi-locale monitoring, and REST API plus MCP integration. 40+ features across all modules.

Why it matters: Qwairy's six-module structure with ROI attribution and crawler analytics shows the market expects full-stack platforms that connect monitoring to measurable business outcomes.

AthenaHQ monitors 8+ AI platforms with real-time sentiment intelligence, prompt volume estimation, and dynamic crawler-management positioning. Public materials describe self-serve and enterprise packaging built around credits and analytics integrations.

Why it matters: AthenaHQ's credit-based packaging makes actual cost less obvious from a single headline price. Its crawler-management and analytics-integration positioning shows the market moving toward platforms that connect AI visibility with traditional analytics.

Writesonic combines AI search tracking across major answer surfaces with traditional SEO tooling, citation-source identification, shopping visibility, sentiment analysis, and an integrated SEO content agent.

Why it matters: Writesonic's bundling of GEO monitoring with full SEO content generation at $249/month sets a price-value benchmark for platforms offering both monitoring and content creation.

Semrush launched Enterprise AI Optimization (AIO) automations in May 2026 adding Reddit Analysis (identify threads where competitors are cited but your brand is absent) and Negative Sentiment Analysis (surface domains contributing to negative brand perception). The core toolkit tracks visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, and Perplexity with AI Visibility Scores, brand performance, competitor research, and prompt research from a 261M+ prompt database across 15 regional databases. Their 248K Reddit post study confirmed Reddit is the #1 cited domain on Perplexity (4% share) and #3 on Google AI Mode (9% share).

Why it matters: Semrush's 261M+ prompt database, Reddit analysis, and negative sentiment detection set the enterprise bar. Their 248K-post Reddit study is the strongest public evidence linking social discussion to AI citation outcomes. Available standalone or with Semrush One subscription.

Foglift monitors 5 AI engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overview, Gemini, Claude) with daily to hourly frequency depending on tier. Features include visibility score percentage, citation URL tracking, position tracking (1st/2nd/3rd in responses), sentiment analysis, prompt-level breakdown, weekly digest emails, webhook alerts, and competitor comparison. 2026 roadmap includes browser-based GEO queries (Q1), citation tracking expansion (Q2), multi-language monitoring (Q2), and AI content writer (Q2). Pricing: Launch $49/mo (daily), Growth $129/mo (twice-daily), Enterprise $299/mo (hourly).

Why it matters: Foglift's hourly monitoring cadence is the fastest in the market — no other competitor offers sub-daily refresh. Their planned multi-language support and AI content writer show the market converging on full-stack GEO workflows.

Peec AI tracks brand visibility across 6+ AI engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek — with Grok as add-on) with daily automated tracking. Features include mention monitoring with position and sentiment scoring, citation source analysis, competitive benchmarking, multi-country monitoring, and an Actions module. $21M Series A (Nov 2025, led by Singular) + seed = $29.1M total. 1,300+ brands, $4M+ ARR, 300+ new customers/month. Valuation above $100M. As of May 2026, public pricing emphasizes brand or agency packaging plus credits and add-ons rather than one stable universal starter tier. NYC sales office planned Q2 2026.

Why it matters: Peec's $29M funding and 1,300+ customer base make it the second-most funded mid-market AI visibility tool. Extra fees for Claude/Gemini and credit-model packaging create cost uncertainty that full-access platforms can exploit. NYC expansion signals aggressive US market push.

Profound raised $96M total through Series C at a $1B valuation (Feb 2026). Tracks 10+ AI engines with prompt volumes from opted-in user panels, answer engine insights, citation share analysis, and AI-powered content agents generating briefs and article drafts. Enterprise tier includes Agent Analytics for crawler tracking, SOC 2 Type II compliance, SSO, and API access. Ranked #34 on G2's Top 50 AI Products of 2026. Serves ~10% of Fortune 500.

Why it matters: Profound's $96M raise at a $1B valuation makes it the highest-valued pure-play AI visibility company. Their 10% Fortune 500 penetration and G2 #34 ranking set the enterprise credibility bar.

Surva.ai monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews with daily scans. Features include one-click AI-optimized article generation, direct CMS publishing (WordPress, Webflow), competitor gap analysis, citation tracking, GEO content optimization, AI crawler logs, and Slack/Teams integrations. Pricing materials reviewed in May 2026 list Starter, Growth, and Business tiers with prompt/article capacity and API access on higher tiers.

Why it matters: Surva.ai's direct CMS publishing to WordPress and Webflow raises the implementation bar for monitoring tools. Their bundled article generation per plan creates a clear content creation value proposition.

SEOmonitor uses existing keyword lists (not separate prompts) to automatically generate 50,000+ prompt variations per keyword across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity. Tracks AI Search Presence (% of search volume mentioned), AI Search Cited (% cited as source), Citation Rank, Context Analysis, and Sentiment. March 2026 update added LLM Switcher for real-time model comparison. Builds independent historical data per model.

Why it matters: SEOmonitor's keyword-to-prompt approach eliminates the prompt setup barrier — existing SEO workflows extend directly to AI visibility. 50K+ prompt variations per keyword creates comprehensive coverage from minimal user input.

Sona provides AI visibility tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews with competitor Share of Voice calculation. Recommends 50-100 query test suites organized by buyer journey stage. Free AI Visibility audit covers 17 technical checks (crawlability, schema, structure, freshness) in under 30 seconds. Competitive benchmark of 20%+ Share of Voice. Research finding: brands mentioned in first two sentences are 5x more likely to enter consideration.

Why it matters: Sona's structured benchmarking framework (50-100 queries by journey stage, 20% SoV target) and 17-check audit create a repeatable methodology that buyers find credible.

Targetlytics tracks AI brand visibility with daily monitoring across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. Features include brand mention tracking, competitor comparison, citation source analysis, and weekly email digests. Pricing starts at $49/mo for 50 prompts.

Why it matters: Targetlytics' affordable entry point ($49/mo) and daily monitoring cadence appeal to SMBs. Their focus on three core platforms keeps the product simple but limits multi-engine coverage.

SE Ranking added AI Visibility Tracker alongside its established SEO toolkit. Monitors brand mentions and citations across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. Integrates AI visibility data with traditional SERP tracking for a unified SEO + AI view. Pricing starts at $129/mo with a 14-day free trial.

Why it matters: SE Ranking's hybrid approach bundling traditional SERP tracking with AI visibility appeals to teams already using SEO tools. The 14-day trial removes adoption friction.

Trakkr AI offers AI brand visibility monitoring targeted at SMBs. Tracks brand mentions across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and AI Overviews with automated weekly reports, competitor benchmarking, and citation source analysis. 14-day free trial. Rated 4.7/5 by DemandSage.

Why it matters: At $79/mo, Trakkr fills the affordable SMB gap between free checkers and enterprise platforms. Their 4.7/5 rating suggests strong user satisfaction for the price point.

Alertmouse provides real-time monitoring alerts for AI search visibility changes. Offers a free plan with basic monitoring and paid tiers at $120/year. Focuses on alert-first workflows rather than comprehensive dashboards.

Why it matters: Alertmouse's free tier and alert-first approach appeals to teams wanting lightweight monitoring without dashboard overhead. At $120/year, it's the most affordable paid option in the market.

GetMentions AI launched in April 2026 as an AI visibility platform combining analytics with execution. Tracks brand appearance across ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode, and Perplexity. Offers managed execution with page-level insertions and domain-level placements across 192,000+ partner websites. Pricing: Starter $85/mo (50 prompts), Growth $155/mo (100 prompts), Pro $289/mo (200 prompts), Scale $479/mo (350 prompts). Weekly refresh at lower tiers; daily at higher tiers.

Why it matters: GetMentions is the first platform to combine monitoring with managed execution, but execution means paid placements — not organic citability improvement. This is a fundamentally different value proposition from organic visibility optimization.

Meltwater GenAI Lens monitors brand presence across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, and DeepSeek with 48-hour data refresh. Mid-year 2026 release added AI-powered recommendations and LLM-generated branded reporting. Source attribution identifies high-authority websites and journalists that AI models cite. Trusted by PR, communications, and marketing teams across 27,000+ organizations.

Why it matters: Meltwater's 27,000+ organization distribution is massive but serves PR/comms teams, not SEO or content marketing. 48-hour refresh is slower than daily monitoring competitors. Enterprise-only pricing excludes SMBs and agencies.

Brandlight publicly positions its platform around AI visibility, attribution, competitive intelligence, content optimization, publisher performance, technical crawl analysis, and enterprise command-center reporting. Public product copy highlights visibility across AI engines, query intent and citation analysis, crawl frequency and coverage monitoring, server-log analysis, multi-region deployment, and SOC 2 Type II compliance.

Why it matters: Brandlight expands the enterprise competitive set beyond SEO-native AI visibility vendors. Its technical crawler module and publisher intelligence reinforce that buyers expect AI visibility platforms to connect answer monitoring, crawlability, partnerships, and executive reporting.

Evidence: Public search results still surface the /prompts listing with a legacy 'Best AI Prompts Library' snippet while the homepage describes prompts-gpt.com as an AI visibility platform.

Impact: Evaluators can misclassify prompts-gpt.com as a generic prompt library instead of an AI Search Visibility platform.

Action: Keep /, /features, /pricing, /resources, /docs, /articles, and self-audit exports internally consistent; keep canonical AI visibility positioning in llms.txt and avoid reintroducing prompt-library-first metadata.

Evidence: The free checker URL is public and shareable, but the output can change as providers, citations, and model behavior shift.

Impact: External stakeholders may treat mutable diagnostics as stable evidence and misread score changes as regressions.

Action: Use markdown/JSON exports and the self-audit article as the default proof artifacts in public sharing and documentation.